Biocurious is a weblog about biology through the eyes of physicists. More...
Academics
Andre's Research
Biocuriosities
Books
Graduate School
History of Science
Hot off the Press
Igor's Research
Interdisciplinarity
Molecule of the Month
Open Access
Philip's Research
Philosophy of Science
Physics
Physicsworld.com
Backreaction
Ceclia's Blog at PHD Comics
Cocktail Party Physics
Cosmic Variance
The Daily Transcript
Easternblot
Everyday Scientist
The Evilutionary Biologist
Evolgen
Freelancing Science
The Futile Cycle
Good Math, Bad Math
iMechanica
in singulo
Incoherently Scattered Ponderings
Juniorprof
Klara Stefflova
Life of a Lab Rat
The Loom
Malletrivia
Metadatta
Mixed States
Morning Coffee Physics
Not Even Wrong
Notes from the biomass
Notional Slurry
OpenScience Project
Pharyngula
PLoS Blog
Ponderings of a fool
Recombinants
The Sandwalk
SciAm Observations
ScienceBlogs
Shtetl-Optimized
Three-toed Sloth
Uncertain Principles
What's New by Bob Park



Arrogant physicists can say the most hilarious things. Like the above, said by recent Templeton Prize winner John Barrow to none other than Richard Dawkins.
PZ gets him* back though, “Yeah, and some physicists are little more than glorified numerologists.”
* I was going to say “us” given my own physics background, but I don’t want to be associated with the likes of Barrow.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Physical theory is the Madam of the sciences, and it is hollow. String theory has no empirically falsifable observables. Even classic gravitation is deficient: Is the postulated Equivalence Principle true? (All local centers of mass fall identically in vacuum). The single case that can be an EP violation and still be consistent with prior observations (test masses of identical composition but opposite geometric parity) will NEVER be performed. No physicist can look into a stereodiagram and make any sense of simultaneous homochirality along all coordinate axes. “If it were a good experiment, somebody would have already done it.”
Jesus wept.
WA Little proposed a chemical structure for excitonic room temperature superconductors:
decorated polyacetylenes, [C(Ph)=(Ph)C]n,
Phys. Rev. A 134 1416 (1964)
1) A linear polyacetylene core, 2) With pendant polarizable chromophores, 3) Said chromophores’ pi-clouds being no more than one sigma bond from the core, 4) And the core being entirely surrounded and enveloped by a cylindrical pi-cloud.Here is a progression of three cases. Somebody should synthesize the polymers and discover whether Little foresaw the future. These are trivial syntheses in 2006! Fat chance. Physicists cannot synthesize. Chemists don’t give a damn about Little.
Simple phenyl substitution. Not much of an enveloping pi-cloud. 33.234 kcal/mole polymer stabilization
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/benzen1.png
Pyrene substitution. Better pi-cloud coverage. 442.894 kcal/mole polymer stabilization.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/pyrene1.png
Decacylene substitution. Dense enveloping pi-cloud coverage. 806.560 kcal/mole polymer stabilization .
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/decacyc1.png
That is 25 kcal/mole-aryl group. The stabilizing interaction is strongly persistent near room temp.
As you read this, Uncle Al is mm+ minimizing another accessible Little polymer structure. At 1945 PST it is -1153.493 kcal/mole and slowly dropping. It will NEVER be synthesized. Funding for chemistry offends funding for physics, and vice-versa. Euchred!
Jesus wept.