Biocurious
/ a biophysics blog
About Biocurious
Biocurious is a weblog about biology through the eyes of physicists. More...
Recent comments
Molecule of the Month
Browse by section
Academics
Andre's Research
Biocuriosities
Books
Graduate School
History of Science
Hot off the Press
Igor's Research
Interdisciplinarity
Molecule of the Month
Open Access
Philip's Research
Philosophy of Science
Physics
Physicsworld.com
Other blogs
Backreaction
Ceclia's Blog at PHD Comics
Cocktail Party Physics
Cosmic Variance
The Daily Transcript
Easternblot
Everyday Scientist
The Evilutionary Biologist
Evolgen
Freelancing Science
The Futile Cycle
Good Math, Bad Math
iMechanica
in singulo
Incoherently Scattered Ponderings
Juniorprof
Life of a Lab Rat
The Loom
Malletrivia
Metadatta
Mixed States
Not Even Wrong
Notes from the biomass
Notional Slurry
OpenScience Project
Pharyngula
PLoS Blog
Ponderings of a fool
Recombinants
The Sandwalk
SciAm Observations
ScienceBlogs
Shtetl-Optimized
Three-toed Sloth
Uncertain Principles
What's New by Bob Park
Powered by
Hosted by
How Science Actually Works
Posted 9 April 2006 by Andre under Philosophy of Science
In response to my interpretation of the significance of the recent discovery of Tiktaalik roseae Nate responded with some comments on the Popperian view of falsifiability that I think are worth referring to from the main page. Nate’s comment is here and my response is here. I would love to hear other people’s opinions on this.
The helix with 3.7 residues per turn and the pleated sheet Googling Tiktaalik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
The post at http://bayes.wordpress.com/2006/03/07/the-evolutionary-imperative-to-post-at-length/ might be of interest =)
-Alex.