Biocurious is a weblog about biology through the eyes of physicists. More...
Academics
Andre's Research
Biocuriosities
Books
Graduate School
History of Science
Hot off the Press
Igor's Research
Interdisciplinarity
Molecule of the Month
Open Access
Philip's Research
Philosophy of Science
Physics
Physicsworld.com
Backreaction
Ceclia's Blog at PHD Comics
Cocktail Party Physics
Cosmic Variance
The Daily Transcript
Easternblot
Everyday Scientist
The Evilutionary Biologist
Evolgen
Freelancing Science
The Futile Cycle
Good Math, Bad Math
iMechanica
in singulo
Incoherently Scattered Ponderings
Juniorprof
Life of a Lab Rat
The Loom
Malletrivia
Metadatta
Mixed States
Not Even Wrong
Notes from the biomass
Notional Slurry
OpenScience Project
Pharyngula
PLoS Blog
Ponderings of a fool
Recombinants
The Sandwalk
SciAm Observations
ScienceBlogs
Shtetl-Optimized
Three-toed Sloth
Uncertain Principles
What's New by Bob Park



I’m in Salt Lake City at the Biophysical Society annual meeting this week and I just saw some great talks on single molecule mechanics. It’s time for a food break so I’ll take the chance to tell you a little bit about the conference so far.
After arriving on Friday evening and starting a sampling of Salt Lake brew pubs at Squatters (highly recommended), I attended the first talks of the conference yesterday. Rather than try to summarize everything (you can read the abstracts online for that), I’ll just highlight some of my favourites. One of them was by Hendrik Dietz from Matthias Rief’s lab whom I met last summer during my visit there. He showed that even though he hasn’t demonstrated the simultaneous fluorescence/atomic force microscope that he’s working on, he’s kept himself productively busy:

He talked about some recent work that they just published on engineered green fluorescent proteins that will polymerize into a long chain (via disulphide bonds between cysteine residues they added) appropriate for single molecule AFM pulling. One of the nice things about engineered proteins is that you can add the cysteines where you want and so they could pull the GFPs along several different axes instead of only the normal N- to C-terminus axis (see the figure for two examples). They found that there was a surprising array of stabilities along the different axes: the average unfolding forces ranged from the normal ~80 pN unfolding forces up to over 500 pN. I find this interesting from two points of view: as an expanded way to study protein structure and mechanics with AFM and as a tool to demonstrate the first simultaneous forced unfolding of proteins correlated with fluorescence changes.
Based on his talk I will now make the prediction that the first success in simultaneous fluorescence/force microscopy at the single molecule level will come from Hendrik since he now has a construct with lots of fluorescence, high unfolding forces, and a clear signature of unfolding in both fluorescence and force. There are still challenges, but it’s get closer all the time. Good luck Hendrik!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
If we’re counting optical tweezers as force microscopes (which I think we should), then Steve Block’s lab has beaten everyone to the punch.
Now, that being said, I don’t know any optical tweezers instruments capable of applying or detecting anywhere near 500pN forces, so this is (obviously) still an important result!
if you have more people knowing what you do, the way you do, criticizing your work, etc. Soon or later you may be kicked out of the picture. In the other way around, if you just keep on submiting papers to journals of rank A to rank Z, until your paper get accepted! There will be no way to slow down the so called paper publishing machine.
So the idea of the two other options is to help clean up the “trash science”.