Biocurious is a weblog about biology through the eyes of physicists. More...
Academics
Andre's Research
Biocuriosities
Books
Graduate School
History of Science
Hot off the Press
Igor's Research
Interdisciplinarity
Molecule of the Month
Open Access
Philip's Research
Philosophy of Science
Physics
Physicsworld.com
Backreaction
Ceclia's Blog at PHD Comics
Cocktail Party Physics
Cosmic Variance
The Daily Transcript
Easternblot
Everyday Scientist
The Evilutionary Biologist
Evolgen
Freelancing Science
The Futile Cycle
Good Math, Bad Math
iMechanica
in singulo
Incoherently Scattered Ponderings
Juniorprof
Life of a Lab Rat
The Loom
Malletrivia
Metadatta
Mixed States
Not Even Wrong
Notes from the biomass
Notional Slurry
OpenScience Project
Pharyngula
PLoS Blog
Ponderings of a fool
Recombinants
The Sandwalk
SciAm Observations
ScienceBlogs
Shtetl-Optimized
Three-toed Sloth
Uncertain Principles
What's New by Bob Park



I thought it would be useful to compile a few general resources as I come across them. This will be the general theme of this and any future Random Walks articles (but as the name implies, I don’t plan on sticking strictly to any format). To keep with the title, I’ll send you first to the Biophysical Society’s history of biophysics website. Then, if you enjoyed that, you can check out this older article (1995) in Physics Today that I find quite interesting. It argues for more representation in physics departments from faculty studying important emerging areas of physics, including biophysics. The article comes in two parts (pdf). Part 2
I wish I had been at the opportunities for physicists in biology meeting, but I guess this is the next best thing. The site has slides from the presenters’ talks as well as video of most of the presentations. The meeting was intended to provide an overview of some areas, so the talks are less technical than those at a typical scientific conference.
Finally, this is a document that resulted from a three day workshop at Arizona State University. Although the focus is on theory, I think it does a very good job of outlining many of the interesting challenges facing biological physicists, including experimentalists, that will drive the field in the next few years. I personally get pretty excited when I read it, but I don’t expect that to be a general phenomenon!
The Poor Misunderstood Electric Eel Why can't scientists write good?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.