Biocurious is a weblog about biology through the eyes of physicists. More...
Academics
Andre's Research
Biocuriosities
Books
Graduate School
History of Science
Hot off the Press
Igor's Research
Interdisciplinarity
Molecule of the Month
Open Access
Philip's Research
Philosophy of Science
Physics
Physicsworld.com
Backreaction
Ceclia's Blog at PHD Comics
Cocktail Party Physics
Cosmic Variance
The Daily Transcript
Easternblot
Everyday Scientist
The Evilutionary Biologist
Evolgen
Freelancing Science
The Futile Cycle
Good Math, Bad Math
iMechanica
in singulo
Incoherently Scattered Ponderings
Juniorprof
Life of a Lab Rat
The Loom
Malletrivia
Metadatta
Mixed States
Not Even Wrong
Notes from the biomass
Notional Slurry
OpenScience Project
Pharyngula
PLoS Blog
Ponderings of a fool
Recombinants
The Sandwalk
SciAm Observations
ScienceBlogs
Shtetl-Optimized
Three-toed Sloth
Uncertain Principles
What's New by Bob Park



Would real x-ray goggles be good for anything other than giving people cancer?
The Slimmer List of Edge Dangerous Ideas How do you design biology intelligently?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
What, that’s not good enough for you?! :)
How about x-ray google goggles? They can give you cancer and then search for a cure online.
Cancer in the people you look at you mean? CCD goggles (like for IR) and a lead suit would leave the user perfectly safe.
Yeah, that’s what I meant. When I first had the thought I was guessing that the backscattered intensity would be too small for imaging and so x-ray goggles would be totally useless as goggles. But not surprisingly I’m wrong and people do generate impressive images by detecting backscattered x-rays. They’re even talking about using this technology in airports so that security personal can make freaky pornography after-hours.